Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-19 13:39:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A43813D0F01DC85ED4C58BC533931A1A4C37CC37808645C67F7B2F0B6ED44FF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : Il n'y a rien de factuellement faux dans le post qui donne un avis personnel. Veuillez utilisez les commentaires pour débattre et vous conformez aux conditions d'utilisation des notes de la communauté.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726220897378271605
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A43813D0F01DC85ED4C58BC533931A1A4C37CC37808645C67F7B2F0B6ED44FF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1700401152255
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1726220897378271605A43813D0F01DC85ED4C58BC533931A1A4C37CC37808645C67F7B2F0B6ED44FF5