Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-19 08:32:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E6827BFC36C504C94E90F701B72165F45925D9AE5BB7E75FE571008B3810499
Participant Details

Original Note:

El post no necesita contexto por expresar una realidad pero no permitir comentarios para evitar desacuerdos u opiniones contrarias y debate desvirtua la pluralidad e imparcialidad necesarios que un buen comunicador debería promover para que la información no parezca sesgada https://www.comisiondequejas.com/otras-normas-eticas/codigos/codigo-internacional-de-etica-periodistica-unesco/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726022765856112950
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E6827BFC36C504C94E90F701B72165F45925D9AE5BB7E75FE571008B3810499
  • createdAtMillis - 1700382736838
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17260227658561129509E6827BFC36C504C94E90F701B72165F45925D9AE5BB7E75FE571008B3810499