Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-18 12:19:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFAA3F2E13DB84597D38F34D7CD1AB95F97DD8C425ADA67D56C501CCDBAFB6D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence to support this claim. Numerous statements by this director have proven to be false. https://www.ngo-monitor.org/reports/ngo-complicity-in-hamas-propaganda-on-gaza-hospital/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725709048467591323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFAA3F2E13DB84597D38F34D7CD1AB95F97DD8C425ADA67D56C501CCDBAFB6D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1700309965405
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1725709048467591323BFAA3F2E13DB84597D38F34D7CD1AB95F97DD8C425ADA67D56C501CCDBAFB6D1