Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-18 05:23:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA0D22F6D5A0A6380070B6ED09B665A492F6BDE9B05E9E59BFC4DF2DC82C14A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence to support this claim. Numerous statements by this director have proven to be false. https://www.ngo-monitor.org/reports/ngo-complicity-in-hamas-propaganda-on-gaza-hospital/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725698246339666170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA0D22F6D5A0A6380070B6ED09B665A492F6BDE9B05E9E59BFC4DF2DC82C14A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1700285008053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1725698246339666170FA0D22F6D5A0A6380070B6ED09B665A492F6BDE9B05E9E59BFC4DF2DC82C14A5