Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-18 14:23:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB3F0661C21AF7B73592945A5F8F8FFCF3EFFE595374601A29E675C83B636B40
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Sunak’s tweet isn’t suggesting that the ECtHR was responsible for the latest judgment - it’s clearly referring to possible future challenges. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022/jun/15/what-is-the-echr-and-how-did-it-intervene-in-uk-rwanda-flight-plans (And a statement of policy intent is by definition not misinformation, so shouldn’t be Community Noted.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725431561682600340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB3F0661C21AF7B73592945A5F8F8FFCF3EFFE595374601A29E675C83B636B40
  • createdAtMillis - 1700317429721
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1725431561682600340DB3F0661C21AF7B73592945A5F8F8FFCF3EFFE595374601A29E675C83B636B40