Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-16 22:10:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C187092DAE6CF03B27734B6232C5794BBD90E500E78D808FCDE3BCDA564A2536
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Apesar de os dados estarem no portal transparência, o jornalista em questão se mostra de fato incomodado com o escrutínio. A nota de correção não é necessária.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725266557251493902
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C187092DAE6CF03B27734B6232C5794BBD90E500E78D808FCDE3BCDA564A2536
  • createdAtMillis - 1700172638367
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1725266557251493902C187092DAE6CF03B27734B6232C5794BBD90E500E78D808FCDE3BCDA564A2536