Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-17 01:21:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D6C1C6984196C64246634A23D3F6B89442DF188D2E209468839E6F4F5E1376B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Apesar de os dados estarem no portal transparência, o jornalista em questão se mostra de fato incomodado com o escrutínio. A nota de correção não é necessária.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725266557251493902
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D6C1C6984196C64246634A23D3F6B89442DF188D2E209468839E6F4F5E1376B
  • createdAtMillis - 1700184085032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17252665572514939029D6C1C6984196C64246634A23D3F6B89442DF188D2E209468839E6F4F5E1376B