Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-17 02:35:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85F262F3927357DEED85263A64696730FDB2FCC210C37F52B15AD75AF40DBAEB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Apesar de os dados estarem no portal transparência, o jornalista em questão se mostra de fato incomodado com o escrutínio. A nota de correção não é necessária.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725266557251493902
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85F262F3927357DEED85263A64696730FDB2FCC210C37F52B15AD75AF40DBAEB
  • createdAtMillis - 1700188557033
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172526655725149390285F262F3927357DEED85263A64696730FDB2FCC210C37F52B15AD75AF40DBAEB