Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-16 20:21:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4F3B0B0BBCBAA3EC3DE2A7478227E58CCFE5771625D419463AE2D5F50CC49C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case appears to involve false advertisement, enticement to theft, and perhaps theft itself. None of those are protected by free speech. https://www.ft.com/content/9642f1a5-e1b4-41ec-86f3-30e6d02e5f1b

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725241652493930883
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4F3B0B0BBCBAA3EC3DE2A7478227E58CCFE5771625D419463AE2D5F50CC49C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1700166064698
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1725241652493930883C4F3B0B0BBCBAA3EC3DE2A7478227E58CCFE5771625D419463AE2D5F50CC49C2