Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-17 02:09:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C171DB07E7BF78926E350E764F613364E4CF2E0AE4DB85892B96521C52238453
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case appears to involve false advertisement, enticement to theft, and perhaps theft itself. None of those are protected by free speech. https://www.ft.com/content/9642f1a5-e1b4-41ec-86f3-30e6d02e5f1b

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1725241652493930883
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C171DB07E7BF78926E350E764F613364E4CF2E0AE4DB85892B96521C52238453
  • createdAtMillis - 1700186972363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1725241652493930883C171DB07E7BF78926E350E764F613364E4CF2E0AE4DB85892B96521C52238453