Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-16 06:47:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F85FD7E4C4EB59E45E8676BE297406F898962CC9125499AFE1BE15734665763
Participant Details

Original Note:

このポストは投稿者が抱く感想に過ぎず、関連法案の成立と浴場への不法侵入が無関係であることに誤解があったり、誤解を広めるような意図は感じられず、補足情報は不要です。 また、通達は行政の内部的な指導に過ぎず、それ自体に法的な拘束力(処分性)とする見解が一般的であり、国民への権利や義務は生じません。 https://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_jp/detail2?id=54975

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724987451440300419
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F85FD7E4C4EB59E45E8676BE297406F898962CC9125499AFE1BE15734665763
  • createdAtMillis - 1700117252414
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17249874514403004194F85FD7E4C4EB59E45E8676BE297406F898962CC9125499AFE1BE15734665763