Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-11-15 22:00:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7FFA1CB005B09DBF178B28739BB68124EF2594FD77BD7DF061B8878FD52F673E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Claims of misconduct require careful review not always conveyed in posts. ‘Credibly accused’ is misleading by not providing full inquiry outcomes. Fraud demands rigorous evaluation, not non-expert misinterp. e.g. Stanford review found no misconduct by Tessier-Lavigne: https://news.stanford.edu/report/2023/07/19/presidents-message-stanford-community/ https://www.cohenseglias.com/news-article/scandal-fallout-former-stanford-president-threat-science/
All Note Details