Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-02 22:59:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 52B12EABD0EEEB72EB479201C47B3128E4A7451ADD24D7D7B65AF926D8E06213
Participant Details
Original Note:
Claims of misconduct require careful review not always conveyed in posts. ‘Credibly accused’ is misleading by not providing full inquiry outcomes. Fraud demands rigorous evaluation, not non-expert misinterp. e.g. Stanford review found no misconduct by Tessier-Lavigne: https://news.stanford.edu/report/2023/07/19/presidents-message-stanford-community/ https://www.cohenseglias.com/news-article/scandal-fallout-former-stanford-president-threat-science/
All Note Details