Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-17 09:35:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EECEA37C79C61EF649FE7B317E541ECDAF9ED42E41B267996652E31D4C9FFA16
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is misleading to mention the European Court of Human Rights here as if the European Convention on Human Rights was the basis of the Supreme Court’s judgment. The basis for the judgment was the principle of non-refoulement which is a core principle of all international law. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2023-0093-press-summary.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724851202754572653
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EECEA37C79C61EF649FE7B317E541ECDAF9ED42E41B267996652E31D4C9FFA16
  • createdAtMillis - 1700213725833
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724851202754572653EECEA37C79C61EF649FE7B317E541ECDAF9ED42E41B267996652E31D4C9FFA16