Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-15 20:02:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 711DA70D212B404F72D4B349D1989E9AC5C0A9AD6DB862D7FE10E30C762BF2FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is misleading to mention the European Court of Human Rights here as if the European Convention on Human Rights was the basis of the Supreme Court’s judgment. The basis for the judgment was the principle of non-refoulement which is a core principle of all international law. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2023-0093-press-summary.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724851202754572653
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 711DA70D212B404F72D4B349D1989E9AC5C0A9AD6DB862D7FE10E30C762BF2FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1700078541639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724851202754572653711DA70D212B404F72D4B349D1989E9AC5C0A9AD6DB862D7FE10E30C762BF2FF