Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-17 08:15:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 506E921CEF0991060D721E34D5D491BD7D41C19AFAEB44A8B1CAB45762E1DDA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is misleading to mention the European Court of Human Rights here as if the European Convention on Human Rights was the basis of the Supreme Court’s judgment. The basis for the judgment was the principle of non-refoulement which is a core principle of all international law. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2023-0093-press-summary.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724851202754572653
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 506E921CEF0991060D721E34D5D491BD7D41C19AFAEB44A8B1CAB45762E1DDA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1700208938471
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724851202754572653506E921CEF0991060D721E34D5D491BD7D41C19AFAEB44A8B1CAB45762E1DDA3