Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-16 11:24:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F292AF8D94FCC79813665CBC10B5AB2DA2B4809721D579247A6D9CDAB9796C3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the conclusion of the verdict is: Secretary of State’s policy is unlawful. The Secretary of State’s appeal is therefore dismissed. For the reasons explained in our discussion of Issue 4, at paras 107-148 above, the cross-appeal by ASM is also dismissed. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2023-0093-etc-judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724842630175916436
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F292AF8D94FCC79813665CBC10B5AB2DA2B4809721D579247A6D9CDAB9796C3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1700133842068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724842630175916436F292AF8D94FCC79813665CBC10B5AB2DA2B4809721D579247A6D9CDAB9796C3A