Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-15 17:45:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A6D80566D58EB41586B18B3B3FD18D0E159D5209F0DE810D6C854A855D10BEB
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the conclusion of the verdict is: Secretary of State’s policy is unlawful. The Secretary of State’s appeal is therefore dismissed. For the reasons explained in our discussion of Issue 4, at paras 107-148 above, the cross-appeal by ASM is also dismissed. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2023-0093-etc-judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724842630175916436
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A6D80566D58EB41586B18B3B3FD18D0E159D5209F0DE810D6C854A855D10BEB
  • createdAtMillis - 1700070358595
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17248426301759164360A6D80566D58EB41586B18B3B3FD18D0E159D5209F0DE810D6C854A855D10BEB