Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-15 15:57:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7293B5F6323704BE1ABDC9684E711B2EB5D600C9DE153B6EC6DC4A7360F5EBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first line in the article explains the headline in more detail You gotta read past headlines, or else you don’t get to claim you were misled

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724792255024963799
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7293B5F6323704BE1ABDC9684E711B2EB5D600C9DE153B6EC6DC4A7360F5EBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1700063827693
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724792255024963799A7293B5F6323704BE1ABDC9684E711B2EB5D600C9DE153B6EC6DC4A7360F5EBF