Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-15 00:45:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 666FE3E5690F416B353D420C4B693E6C65CC8C6798DDCEC6299A1B4A6CF12311
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. A margem de erro de pesquisas eleitorais, em geral, são superiores a essa diferença apontada pelo autor da nota e pelo autor do post. Da pesquisa em questão,a margem de erro foi de 4,4% para mais ou para menos, como pode ser confirmado no link abaixo. https://cnnportugal.iol.pt/crise-politica/eleicoes-antecipadas/ps-cai-a-pique-mas-ganhava-outra-vez-as-eleicoes-sondagem-tvi-cnn-portugal/20231113/6552786dd34e65afa2f7875f

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724541259895762967
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 666FE3E5690F416B353D420C4B693E6C65CC8C6798DDCEC6299A1B4A6CF12311
  • createdAtMillis - 1700009105849
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724541259895762967666FE3E5690F416B353D420C4B693E6C65CC8C6798DDCEC6299A1B4A6CF12311