Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-14 10:28:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F623A4E08D7FB319718FB02B329EBB82CCBE9C6A3868C07DD0C159118B8EE83B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Der Autor macht aus dem „could“ im verlinkten Artikel ein „Beeindruckend“ und „sinkt“, also aus einer (fragwürdigen) und einseitigen Prognose eine Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit von 100 Prozent. Damit wird die Grenze zur Desinformation überschritten. https://t.co/fmF3kKhpAQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724357581001441738
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F623A4E08D7FB319718FB02B329EBB82CCBE9C6A3868C07DD0C159118B8EE83B
  • createdAtMillis - 1699957691447
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1724357581001441738F623A4E08D7FB319718FB02B329EBB82CCBE9C6A3868C07DD0C159118B8EE83B