Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-14 09:59:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 049B0B045AF1A308151AE42E70A703F87E5E86808CA7C90543C9412CF1032071
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reasumpcja w 2015 Sikorskiego była spowodowana problemami z oddawaniem głosów i wynik ostatecznego głosowania pokazywał jednoznaczne duże różnice w głosach. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4KTjdXBuCM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724303827413672370
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 049B0B045AF1A308151AE42E70A703F87E5E86808CA7C90543C9412CF1032071
  • createdAtMillis - 1699955944914
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724303827413672370049B0B045AF1A308151AE42E70A703F87E5E86808CA7C90543C9412CF1032071