Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-13 22:56:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E41C63B655EF5FFBD3DE0F7189997CBFEC5CA2A8E25E62BAC580D99AB2076F00
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The money didn't go to charity like it was promised. Whether it was used for something else or not is irrelevant because it was still "pocketed" Dexerto has gotten a lot wrong before, but this post is actually a great example of what they should strive for on every tweet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724195146781036582
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E41C63B655EF5FFBD3DE0F7189997CBFEC5CA2A8E25E62BAC580D99AB2076F00
  • createdAtMillis - 1699916165857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724195146781036582E41C63B655EF5FFBD3DE0F7189997CBFEC5CA2A8E25E62BAC580D99AB2076F00