Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-13 23:56:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 641CDE0142687F84643462E121939B0EF9288E9C1CFBEC844F6FE304D56B5A46
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The money didn't go to charity like it was promised. Whether it was used for something else or not is irrelevant because it was still "pocketed" Dexerto has gotten a lot wrong before, but this post is actually a great example of what they should strive for on every tweet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724195146781036582
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 641CDE0142687F84643462E121939B0EF9288E9C1CFBEC844F6FE304D56B5A46
  • createdAtMillis - 1699919784973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724195146781036582641CDE0142687F84643462E121939B0EF9288E9C1CFBEC844F6FE304D56B5A46