Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-13 02:49:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F08B3DBE54CC18CA8A8BB314744C82FB9586ED92523790E8A36A6DD1BE7560B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. No es necesario criticar el "modelo biomédico" y demás para aclarar las concepciones vulgares sobre el dimorfismo sexual: https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ase.2002 2. Estudiar dimorfismo sexual forma parte de la investigación clásica y tiene precursores en proto-ciencias previas al auge del propio capitalismo: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40599846

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723888214685958564
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F08B3DBE54CC18CA8A8BB314744C82FB9586ED92523790E8A36A6DD1BE7560B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1699843787341
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723888214685958564F08B3DBE54CC18CA8A8BB314744C82FB9586ED92523790E8A36A6DD1BE7560B2