Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-13 01:51:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D95F72F90676184C5E4D3046FE70F861932F8F6F9C256AF2BB6E7B0D0A795D2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note in question is, in fact, within Community Notes guidelines to “create a better-informed world”. The post was worded in a manner that was misleading and the average reader would think the bottle -and all its components- were destroyed and lost all value. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723860994617708801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D95F72F90676184C5E4D3046FE70F861932F8F6F9C256AF2BB6E7B0D0A795D2C
  • createdAtMillis - 1699840309406
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723860994617708801D95F72F90676184C5E4D3046FE70F861932F8F6F9C256AF2BB6E7B0D0A795D2C