Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 16:12:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE2DAEC14FF328DF96380E82247DAADA69B926D848C322BE05F6F577E9483A9D
Participant Details

Original Note:

the OP isn't suggesting this is a current article, they are clearly using a historical article to show how prior patterns of behaviour may indicate present patterns of behaviour. the screenshot clearly shows it's from 2014, we don't need community notes to also point this out

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723318317920710875
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE2DAEC14FF328DF96380E82247DAADA69B926D848C322BE05F6F577E9483A9D
  • createdAtMillis - 1699719140686
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723318317920710875DE2DAEC14FF328DF96380E82247DAADA69B926D848C322BE05F6F577E9483A9D