Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 15:16:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93F5382BC2301DCC6337ECEF3A2B4311F8FDEA88923CC9C84EF229388EC0316D
Participant Details

Original Note:

the OP isn't suggesting this is a current article, they are clearly using a historical article to show how prior patterns of behaviour may indicate present patterns of behaviour. the screenshot clearly shows it's from 2014, we don't need community notes to also point this out

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723318317920710875
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93F5382BC2301DCC6337ECEF3A2B4311F8FDEA88923CC9C84EF229388EC0316D
  • createdAtMillis - 1699715807827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172331831792071087593F5382BC2301DCC6337ECEF3A2B4311F8FDEA88923CC9C84EF229388EC0316D