Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 13:11:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED8135BB22D4C1D285A3B6EDF7A255F2152AF7F3B925B39E6195B7A21C10BFD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This research and info does indicate duplicate counting of multiple votes in only one incident, but points to a more wide spread incident of a miscount and reliance on failed technology for digital assessment. https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1723179757964087503
participantId -
raterParticipantId - ED8135BB22D4C1D285A3B6EDF7A255F2152AF7F3B925B39E6195B7A21C10BFD9
createdAtMillis - 1699708301056
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1723179757964087503ED8135BB22D4C1D285A3B6EDF7A255F2152AF7F3B925B39E6195B7A21C10BFD9