Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 12:54:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This research and info does indicate duplicate counting of multiple votes in only one incident, but points to a more wide spread incident of a miscount and reliance on failed technology for digital assessment. https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1723179757964087503
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9
createdAtMillis - 1699707243410
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1723179757964087503C1E7D716B6979AD308362B425921F47985F8759D11C2B725E186DDA049C52DE9