Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 13:21:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7813D9B17202FEB2A29206F1BBB064F495B8D95E9DE9E546E28727F28051C753
Participant Details

Original Note:

This research and info does indicate duplicate counting of multiple votes in only one incident, but points to a more wide spread incident of a miscount and reliance on failed technology for digital assessment. https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723179757964087503
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7813D9B17202FEB2A29206F1BBB064F495B8D95E9DE9E546E28727F28051C753
  • createdAtMillis - 1699708893898
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17231797579640875037813D9B17202FEB2A29206F1BBB064F495B8D95E9DE9E546E28727F28051C753