Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 14:04:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10
Participant Details

Original Note:

This research and info does indicate duplicate counting of multiple votes in only one incident, but points to a more wide spread incident of a miscount and reliance on failed technology for digital assessment. https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1723179757964087503
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 66F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10
createdAtMillis - 1699711449925
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 172317975796408750366F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10