Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 06:26:39 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26CC0C7A1F17CED982B1C7FE3006D7F6183E178C7ED99FFB4DDA0996441FE54B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This research and info does indicate duplicate counting of multiple votes in only one incident, but points to a more wide spread incident of a miscount and reliance on failed technology for digital assessment. https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1723179757964087503
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 26CC0C7A1F17CED982B1C7FE3006D7F6183E178C7ED99FFB4DDA0996441FE54B
createdAtMillis - 1699683999731
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 172317975796408750326CC0C7A1F17CED982B1C7FE3006D7F6183E178C7ED99FFB4DDA0996441FE54B