Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 22:27:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E596B3409ED069CA87CD6580574FD37DFC1D2AF1E40047FD32A28191521D4DCA
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no reason to think that reach would be proportioned exactly to like count across all topics, all types of tweets, and all types of accounts. The algorithm is based on a complex neural network. There is nothing unusual or biased about these two cases. https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723102237998674009
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E596B3409ED069CA87CD6580574FD37DFC1D2AF1E40047FD32A28191521D4DCA
  • createdAtMillis - 1699655241297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1723102237998674009E596B3409ED069CA87CD6580574FD37DFC1D2AF1E40047FD32A28191521D4DCA