Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 23:41:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 870C3847148664CBA80EB5496FD8189C778034C2AA6C50E0EF3868A1DAEA0EC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no reason to think that reach would be proportioned exactly to like count across all topics, all types of tweets, and all types of accounts. The algorithm is based on a complex neural network. There is nothing unusual or biased about these two cases. https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723102237998674009
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 870C3847148664CBA80EB5496FD8189C778034C2AA6C50E0EF3868A1DAEA0EC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1699659708584
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723102237998674009870C3847148664CBA80EB5496FD8189C778034C2AA6C50E0EF3868A1DAEA0EC2