Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 14:11:48 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5018FAF34F074A7C4DE6CDE19A7141CDF490DDE3D244B26DFEC9FE0FAB0BE56
Participant Details

Original Note:

Accusations retracted in following addition of publication with apology. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/braverman-s-brush-with-the-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723083797623668777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5018FAF34F074A7C4DE6CDE19A7141CDF490DDE3D244B26DFEC9FE0FAB0BE56
  • createdAtMillis - 1720015908577
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723083797623668777F5018FAF34F074A7C4DE6CDE19A7141CDF490DDE3D244B26DFEC9FE0FAB0BE56