Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 07:13:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D332495032C0C42DAA361CF6B3FA77A04ECD5B0ABD8A8A58F77A502D003BB48B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Accusations retracted in following addition of publication with apology. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/braverman-s-brush-with-the-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723083797623668777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D332495032C0C42DAA361CF6B3FA77A04ECD5B0ABD8A8A58F77A502D003BB48B
  • createdAtMillis - 1699686796198
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723083797623668777D332495032C0C42DAA361CF6B3FA77A04ECD5B0ABD8A8A58F77A502D003BB48B