Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 20:21:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F7F6A4F3427C4D2957978B83C844FBA85DF4931F98A9E2AD328FF5ED3840C37
Participant Details

Original Note:

Accusations retracted in following addition of publication with apology. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/braverman-s-brush-with-the-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723083797623668777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F7F6A4F3427C4D2957978B83C844FBA85DF4931F98A9E2AD328FF5ED3840C37
  • createdAtMillis - 1699734113664
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17230837976236687779F7F6A4F3427C4D2957978B83C844FBA85DF4931F98A9E2AD328FF5ED3840C37