Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 19:46:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E567904D0F4D4A8C2CF0C6FC31F33BF0CADFA9A15D966F5F76CFCB14BB0A2310
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No evidence can be found if you are not allowed to look. No valid reason for prohibiting this review of the ballots has been provided. Raffensperger's party affiliation does not reliably indicate his loyalties, and voters seek independent review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723032193121862099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E567904D0F4D4A8C2CF0C6FC31F33BF0CADFA9A15D966F5F76CFCB14BB0A2310
  • createdAtMillis - 1699732004278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723032193121862099E567904D0F4D4A8C2CF0C6FC31F33BF0CADFA9A15D966F5F76CFCB14BB0A2310