Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 23:04:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No evidence can be found if you are not allowed to look. No valid reason for prohibiting this review of the ballots has been provided. Raffensperger's party affiliation does not reliably indicate his loyalties, and voters seek independent review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723032193121862099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088
  • createdAtMillis - 1699657457859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723032193121862099CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088