Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-11 01:09:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C621EC2378AE98D53EA023B441971AB58B1602EA6BAC6C503D292A87BC588CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No evidence can be found if you are not allowed to look. No valid reason for prohibiting this review of the ballots has been provided. Raffensperger's party affiliation does not reliably indicate his loyalties, and voters seek independent review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723032193121862099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C621EC2378AE98D53EA023B441971AB58B1602EA6BAC6C503D292A87BC588CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1699664981711
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17230321931218620990C621EC2378AE98D53EA023B441971AB58B1602EA6BAC6C503D292A87BC588CD