Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 20:54:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 002FE1FBB07691A55A162942495C1CA2DA49A1CF9462F2F9C7E64BCCDB6CC9CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No evidence can be found if you are not allowed to look. No valid reason for prohibiting this review of the ballots has been provided. Raffensperger's party affiliation does not reliably indicate his loyalties, and voters seek independent review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723032193121862099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 002FE1FBB07691A55A162942495C1CA2DA49A1CF9462F2F9C7E64BCCDB6CC9CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1699649663100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723032193121862099002FE1FBB07691A55A162942495C1CA2DA49A1CF9462F2F9C7E64BCCDB6CC9CB