Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-15 23:50:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 729C0D947D41860FF29667A011C46D6B3D9F7D2991E12E562CBFBA33212C22A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No evidence can be found if you are not allowed to look. No valid reason for prohibiting this review of the ballots has been provided. Raffensperger's party affiliation does not reliably indicate his loyalties, and voters seek independent review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1723029470049603901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 729C0D947D41860FF29667A011C46D6B3D9F7D2991E12E562CBFBA33212C22A6
  • createdAtMillis - 1700092248523
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1723029470049603901729C0D947D41860FF29667A011C46D6B3D9F7D2991E12E562CBFBA33212C22A6