Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 17:24:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CBCF44C42DDC290CA3DF2E375D285D2ED4A9ABFC243E16AA8D659C3FFE09757A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Studie ist nicht repräsentativ; Bitkoms Behauptung, Größe allein sichere Repräsentativität, missachtet das Erfordernis einer Zufallsstichprobe. Auch der Nettozuwachs an Nutzern wird in der Studie vernachlässigt. https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/NutzerInnen-ziehen-sich-von-TwitterX-zurueck https://www.sfb186.uni-bremen.de/download/paper18.pdf S. 5 ff

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1723005894705737990
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CBCF44C42DDC290CA3DF2E375D285D2ED4A9ABFC243E16AA8D659C3FFE09757A
createdAtMillis - 1699637089049
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1723005894705737990CBCF44C42DDC290CA3DF2E375D285D2ED4A9ABFC243E16AA8D659C3FFE09757A