Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 04:09:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE7EB5E3FFE5A4307E5E525DA3F520F6E9C57A05E5436D1DC6546043C0BA448F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source is the Guardian. That is a reputable source. You don't get to link the article and say "not enough proof for me" that's not how community notes works. You have to actually disprove it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722776631134110013
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE7EB5E3FFE5A4307E5E525DA3F520F6E9C57A05E5436D1DC6546043C0BA448F
  • createdAtMillis - 1699589396089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1722776631134110013DE7EB5E3FFE5A4307E5E525DA3F520F6E9C57A05E5436D1DC6546043C0BA448F