Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 02:49:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D32B26FFB9F8110A65B2474AA2706EA8A8C535E6412C0CF7660999F3EBA5E0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source is the Guardian. That is a reputable source. You don't get to link the article and say "not enough proof for me" that's not how community notes works. You have to actually disprove it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722776631134110013
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D32B26FFB9F8110A65B2474AA2706EA8A8C535E6412C0CF7660999F3EBA5E0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1699584554920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17227766311341100134D32B26FFB9F8110A65B2474AA2706EA8A8C535E6412C0CF7660999F3EBA5E0D