Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 10:50:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4631F83F35298EF79B53D0B2E7CBCD2EAA419AAE313BEF3DC5B88A674D6356CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source is the Guardian. That is a reputable source. You don't get to link the article and say "not enough proof for me" that's not how community notes works. You have to actually disprove it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722776631134110013
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4631F83F35298EF79B53D0B2E7CBCD2EAA419AAE313BEF3DC5B88A674D6356CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1699613430325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17227766311341100134631F83F35298EF79B53D0B2E7CBCD2EAA419AAE313BEF3DC5B88A674D6356CD