Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 08:15:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 434C4FC341A8E4EDFA712B383470B4FC0B999959F54F1FD383B88BC0541E1A4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source is the Guardian. That is a reputable source. You don't get to link the article and say "not enough proof for me" that's not how community notes works. You have to actually disprove it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722776631134110013
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 434C4FC341A8E4EDFA712B383470B4FC0B999959F54F1FD383B88BC0541E1A4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1699604144558
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1722776631134110013434C4FC341A8E4EDFA712B383470B4FC0B999959F54F1FD383B88BC0541E1A4C