Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 20:40:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C57CC8F428C3643566485614CCC14252B651B880C2E34C797888D02D455DBE4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article doesn't accuse the organizations of having prior knowledge, so denials of prior knowledge are off topic and links to such denials misleading. Potential bias of HonestReporting belongs in the replies, but when used to say ignore the photos it's a genetic fallacy.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722738358374318228
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C57CC8F428C3643566485614CCC14252B651B880C2E34C797888D02D455DBE4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723236054470
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17227383583743182289C57CC8F428C3643566485614CCC14252B651B880C2E34C797888D02D455DBE4