Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 14:10:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9835D391B01764F001D768DC016251E049ECA47DC6E91A7244BF956B5B1E3CA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article doesn't accuse the organizations of having prior knowledge, so denials of prior knowledge are off topic and links to such denials misleading. Potential bias of HonestReporting belongs in the replies, but when used to say ignore the photos it's a genetic fallacy.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722738358374318228
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9835D391B01764F001D768DC016251E049ECA47DC6E91A7244BF956B5B1E3CA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1699625459031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17227383583743182289835D391B01764F001D768DC016251E049ECA47DC6E91A7244BF956B5B1E3CA3